Archive for January, 2006

Your love has expired? Part 2

I mentioned some Italian research a month or so ago that suggested the chemical reaction in our bodies that happens when we fall in love has an expiration date. The cover story of this months National Geographic talks about love in scientific terms. Research suggests that there may be scientific reasons we fall in love with the specific people we fall in love with. It may be bust to hip ratio (which is proven to have an effect on fertility), it may be a guy's BO (which might give a girl a clue to his genetic makeup), or any number of other factors.

A couple people I've talked to find it a bit unsettling, even offensive, to suggest that love might not just happen "magically." Personally, because all of the scientific stuff is subconscious anyway, I don't really care if there might be a biological or genetic reason I fall in love with one girl rather than another. I'm just glad that it happens.

Some Kind of Zombie

Do any of you remember the Disney boycott of the Southern Baptists? How many southern Baptists do you think went and watched The Lion The Witch and the Wardrobe?

Yeah. A lot of them. I think this example of bandwagon Christianity really exemplifies my biggest pet peeve that is common in churches: the lack of critical thinking skills. If I was not already a Christian, boycotts and movie tie-ins would not entice me towards belief.

I bet that we as Christians often look like a bunch of mindless followers, and not followers of Jesus. Some people seem to ask “What should we think?” instead of “What do I think?” Part of Isaiah leads me to believe that boycotts are unscriptural. We can refuse to buy something or support someone, but it should be as thinking individuals and not as part of a church mob mentality. Mobs are easily manipulated. A thinking individual is harder to deceive.

Please, Christians, make your own choices based on your understanding of God. Think!

Diversity

There is a wonderful beauty in diversity and difference. Why don’t we celebrate our differences, especially in the context of church? Why do we try to make everyone more the same rather than more profoundly unique? I believe our desire to conform people who are different stems from insecurity and fear.

When you meet someone who claims to be a Christian but has very different standards than you (in certain cases that are not clearly scriptural issues) your first instinct is probably judgment or rejection. It is important to understand that I am talking about the grey areas where our standards are not defined by scripture, but by personal convictions. Let’s take eating habits as an example. One person feels convinced that they should be a strict vegetarian and only eat organic foods because that is the moral thing to do. Another person feels that eating pork chops from Wal-Mart is morally neutral. Often it is our instinct to judge those with looser standards than ourselves as thoughtless or overindulgent. Those with stricter standards are often seen as puritanical or self-righteous. Why?

We often forget that we are all very different from one another. Then, when we are confronted with differences, we are a bit shocked and place too much emphasis on the difference, rather than the commonalities we share. Difference does not mean inequality. Difference does not imply greater or lesser value. Difference should not lead to separation because of difference, but greater fellowship in the one thing we claim to have in common. We claim that all people are the children of God. In this we are all equal, and no difference can destroy that link between us.

When friends, spouses, families, or churches split over petty arguments it is a resounding message to those around us about what we really believe. When churches split over music or other human traditions it tells everyone that hears about it how superficial that church’s belief in the importance of the equality God has created us with and demanded that we protect. Isn’t it arrogant to think that we “take God’s side” in disputes when ultimately He sent his son to create unity? “God’s side” is not on the side of contemporary worship or traditional hymns. It is not on the side of the conservative or liberal. Those who take God’s side are those who humble themselves and become the servant of their enemies.

Furthermore the unity we have in the mutual Lordship of Jesus in not a unity of sameness and conforming to each other. It is a unity that underlies and supersedes our difference. Unity through whitewashing difference is doomed to fail; unity celebrating difference as inconsequential to the depths of our brotherhood is unshakeable.

Word Power

We began reading the Silmarillion by J.R.R. Tolkein in one of my classes yesterday. Iluvitar spoke the world into existence in much the same way that God spoke light into existence. This made me think about the power of our words.

It seems to me that when we speak something for the first time, it is almost like something new is spoken into existence. I'm not saying that if you walk into the garage and say "Ferarri Enzo" a new car will appear. It is more like that something that already exists is given the permission to exist. This is hard to explain so I will try using an example.

Two people could be in love and know that they are in love without ever telling each other, yet once he tells her of his love, that love becomes almost tangible. It moves from the inwardly known to the outwardly declared.

The love already existed silently inside, but when it was expressed verbally it seems to me that it started to exist on another level, an almost phenomenal level.

What's my point? Good question. I'm not really sure either, except to say this. Are you sure your words are not more powerful than you think?